Taxation without equal representation. Isn't that enough reason to demand reform? How many reasons does the Institution of Wildlife Management need?
The policies and directives of State Wildlife Management should never have made it as far as they have. They are lopsided, antiquated and much of what is sanctioned by these agencies is agreed to behind closed doors and euphemistic pretension to the public.
Ironically, the organizations and Alliance groups that defend hunting are the ones hurting the tradition the most. By radically attempting to block citizen or legislative action for ANY animal protection, they have sent a message that nothing is off limits or too cruel in their opinion.
In a civilized society these organizations and Alliance groups would be smarter. They would come to the table to compromise. They would admit that it is finally time to review some of their practices and "games" and clean up the Hunting front.
They would support democracy, their fellow citizens, the wildlife they proclaim to treasure and the public majority opinion against barbaric cruelty.
Even now as a Bill (H.R. 2210) lands on the table to Federally ban Captive and Internet Hunting, they rally their troops to block this. Why? The majority of their OWN contingency doesn't even approve of Captive Hunting.